[PODCAST] Empowering Nonprofit Boards with Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging TrainingAugust 5, 2023
[PODCAST] Expert Tips and Tools from Chris Lesner for Successful FundraisingAugust 14, 2023
Behind involved, dedicated and committed board of directors, your nonprofit can achieve great things. However, when nonprofit board members aren’t all pulling their weight, they can sink an organization.
When the bad outweighs the good, the late Simone Joyaux, who has worked as a consultant with boards of directors for the past 27 years, said nonprofits can’t be afraid to remove ineffective nonprofit board members, especially when they are ineffective.
Removing Ineffective Nonprofit Board Members
“The whole point is to never have to fire a lousy nonprofit board member,” Joyaux said. “We just have to have done everything correctly in the first place.”
She said this means laying out expectations prior to nonprofit board members prior to them joining the board, establishing an orientation program and mentorship. In addition, she said the board chair should have regular communication and provide feedback to each nonprofit board member.
Giving Feedback to Nonprofit Board Members
Through the expectations and discussions, each nonprofit board member should always know how their performance stacks up. If they are not meeting the minimum standards, use those regular channels of communications to inform them that you want what is best for both them and the organization.
“You are giving them feedback so they know that you’ve been watching and that you actually care,” Joyaux said.
If after addressing shortfalls in performance you’re still experiencing difficulties, it might be time to remove the underperforming nonprofit board members. Your organization should have procedures to deal with these situations. If you do not yet, here are some options as outlined in a post on Blue Avocado by Jan Masaoka.
Options for Removing Nonprofit Board Members
When nonprofit board members aren’t performing up to expectations, the board chair needs to have a frank discussion with them. This discussion can touch on what is going on in their life outside of their involvement on the board. Hopefully, if the chair is in regular communication with the member, none of these discussions should be a surprise.
Rather than taking a more extreme route and forcing the nonprofit board member out, always give them the option to leave on their own terms. This will save them face in the long run and leave the door open for future involvement, should their situation change.
Leave of Absence
This is an alternative to resignation if the issues are temporary (i.e. health issues, professional reasons like a new job or family issues). This will allow a nonprofit board member to step away to settle other parts of their lives. These should be a short-term fix for a situation, so make sure you put a time frame on the leave. That way it doesn’t leave the board in limbo. If more than a year is needed to resolve those issues, a full resignation might be a better option.
While granting a leave is a viable option, your board should have a clear policy on how to treat these absences. What powers and abilities will they have while they are on leave? How will the board treat them in relation to quorum numbers? Before granting a leave, have these discussions with both the board and nonprofit board member.
One way to remove nonprofit board members is to have a limit to their time on the board before they even start. It can provide an easy out for people who aren’t keeping up their end of the bargain to leave the board automatically.
Depending on how long your individual terms are (usually 2-4 years), you can set the limits as two or three consecutive terms. Limiting a nonprofit board member to only a couple of terms will allow them the time to figure out what they are doing on the board, but give your organization an out should you need to go in a different direction.
Some people don’t like term limits because it removes institutional memory built up and it could also remove effective board members. However, Rick Meyers wrote in the Chronicle of Philanthropy that limits have many benefits including helping with recruitment, forcing the organization to develop new leaders, keeping fundraising fresh and leading to healthier boards.
When all else fails, you can take formal action to remove a board member by vote. This route should be taken seriously and used as a last resort.
“One of the things you have to decide is: Is this person being lousy because they don’t know any better,” Joyaux said. “Or is this person lousy and a bully and no matter what we do they will still be a bully and they are making the rest of the board and remove them?”
Your operating bylaws should have a procedure outlined on how to remove a board member. Make sure the steps are in there now, and before you run into any problems down the road. The board should keep documentation on why the board member is being removed and the steps they take.
Being a board director is not an appointment for life. It’s important to remember that removing members is a sometimes necessary part of serving on a board of directors. By keeping communication open and have several options included in your bylaws, it can make the removal process significantly easier to navigate.